theMarketing Calendar
Log inSign up
← All days
day · floating · day 78 of 365

National Close the Gap Day

National Close the Gap Day draws attention to the stubborn health and life expectancy gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians, with a particular focus on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. It is a day built around a simple, practical idea: when a community can access culturally safe health care...

EducationGovernment & LegalHealthcareLife & Living45
Marketing angleinferred

Position your organization as a champion of health equity by sponsoring or hosting community-driven awareness events that highlight Indigenous health disparities and actionable solutions.

Relevance 45low intent
  • Partner with Indigenous health advocates to host a community BBQ or fun run that educates attendees on measurable health gaps and culturally safe care
  • Share employee volunteer stories and organizational commitments to closing health disparities in Indigenous communities
  • Create educational content explaining chronic disease prevention and mental health support access in underserved Indigenous populations
  • Highlight your workplace's diversity and inclusion initiatives tied to supporting Indigenous-led health services

History

National Close the Gap Day was developed from the wider Close the Gap campaign, which began in the mid-2000s as attention grew around serious health inequalities affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.

The movement was built on the belief that health equality is achievable through strong political commitment, sustained investment, and Indigenous leadership.

During this time, health and human rights organizations called for coordinated national action to address life expectancy differences and high levels of preventable illness.

The campaign helped push governments and institutions to set measurable targets and track progress instead of treating the issue as unavoidable. Measurement brought accountability, and accountability created the possibility for real change.

Oxfam Australia played a key role in building public support, encouraging schools, workplaces, and communities to take part in an annual day of action.

Over time, the day became a widely recognized national event that translates policy discussions into everyday participation. It gives people a practical way to say, “This matters, and change is possible.”

The “gap” is not limited to life expectancy. It also appears in rates of chronic disease, maternal and child health, mental wellbeing, disability support, and timely access to care.

Many of these outcomes are connected to broader social and economic conditions, including overcrowded housing, limited access to fresh food, transport barriers, and fewer nearby health services.

Experiences of racism, both in daily life and within institutions, can also discourage early care, allowing manageable conditions to become serious.

National Close the Gap Day sits at the meeting point of health services and the wider factors that influence health. It highlights the need for:

A defining principle of the day is shared responsibility. Indigenous communities have long led efforts to improve their own health and wellbeing, but the day calls on the wider public, institutions, and leaders to act as partners. The responsibility for change should not rest only with those affected. Systems that create inequality must also change.

Participation has grown across many sectors. Schools use the day to explore health, fairness, and community responsibility. Workplaces review policies and strengthen equity commitments.

Health services reflect on patient experience, cultural safety, and barriers to access. Community groups host events that turn concern into practical support.

The day remains both hopeful and challenging. Hopeful because improvement is possible and many successful Indigenous-led initiatives already exist. Challenging because awareness alone is not enough. Closing the gap requires sustained effort, respectful partnerships, and long-term changes that endure.


How to celebrate

Organize a Community BBQ

Light the grill, but give the gathering a clear purpose. A Community BBQ is effective because it feels familiar, relaxed, and naturally brings people together. The most meaningful events go beyond sharing food. They create a safe space for listening, learning, and respectful conversation. A thoughtful plan might include: Clarify the purpose: Explain why everyone is coming together. The “gap” refers to measurable differences in health outcomes and life expectancy, not a general idea. Stating this clearly keeps the focus practical.Invite speakers with care: If an Indigenous health worker, Elder, educator, or community advocate is involved, ask what support they need and whether payment or travel costs should be covered. The aim is to respect experience, not put anyone under pressure.Provide simple information: Use posters, a short handout, or a brief talk to explain key issues such as chronic disease, access to preventive care, mental health support, and the importance of culturally safe services.Offer action cards instead of guilt: Give attendees a short list of practical steps, such as supporting Indigenous-led health services, learning local history, or asking their workplace about its commitments. Small touches matter. Label food clearly, consider dietary needs, and keep the atmosphere welcoming. A day focused on health equity should feel inclusive, positive, and community-oriented.

Join a Fun Run

Put on your running shoes and turn movement into awareness. A fun run or walk fits the spirit of the day because it welcomes different fitness levels, is easy to organize, and creates an uplifting shared experience. It also makes it easier to talk about important issues in a positive setting. To add meaning: Emphasize solidarity, not charity. The focus is fairness and equal rights in health care, not “helping” from a distance. Words matter.Set up an information point. A table at the start or finish can share key facts: the gap is influenced by access to care, prevention, housing, education, income, and experiences of racism within systems.Encourage team participation. Schools can form class groups, workplaces can organize departments, and families can take part together. Shared involvement builds energy.Handle fundraising thoughtfully. If funds are collected, explain their purpose and, where possible, support Indigenous-led organizations. The route can be a short park loop or a larger community course. The key is connecting the activity to the goal: real health equality supported by lasting system change.

Take Part in an Educational Workshop

Build understanding and turn knowledge into action. Workshops and talks are central to National Close the Gap Day because they move the conversation beyond headlines. The most valuable sessions show how everyday conditions shape health outcomes. Helpful focus areas include: Understanding health equity: It means fair access based on need, not identical treatment for everyone.Cultural safety in health care: More than awareness training, it involves trust, respectful communication, and care environments where people feel safe to seek help.Prevention and chronic disease: Early screening, consistent primary care, and community programs can prevent serious illness later.Social determinants of health: Housing, food access, education, employment, transport, and the effects of discrimination all influence health statistics. Strong workshops allow time for reflection and questions. They also encourage follow-up actions such as reviewing workplace practices, improving referral systems, or supporting trusted Indigenous-led services.

Create Art to Raise Awareness

Use creativity to bring the message to life. Art can express emotion, resilience, and hope without turning the day into a lecture. It also opens conversations in places where health policy is rarely discussed. Ideas that work well: Community mural or banner: Invite people to add a handprint, symbol, or word that represents health, fairness, or connection.Story-based artwork: Encourage participants to show what “closing the gap” looks like in everyday life, such as welcoming clinics, mobile services, culturally safe spaces, or inclusive schools.Display with context: If artwork is shown in a library, workplace, or community center, include short captions linking the pieces to goals like better primary care access or improved maternal and child health.Student-led projects: Schools can guide students to explore health as a whole-life concept, including physical, mental, and community wellbeing. Respect for culture is essential. Avoid copying sacred designs or styles. Whenever possible, collaborate with Indigenous artists, use approved materials, or focus on shared responsibility and support.

Share Thoughtfully on Social Media

Take the message online, but keep it meaningful. Social platforms can expand the reach of National Close the Gap Day and highlight Indigenous voices when used responsibly. Ways to make posts count: Use clear, accurate messages: Explain that the gap refers to measurable health differences shaped by systems and access.Amplify Indigenous voices: Share content from Indigenous organizations, leaders, and communities rather than speaking over them.Avoid performative posting: One graphic is easy; real impact comes from follow-up actions such as attending events, supporting initiatives, or asking institutions about their commitments.Show accountability: If posting as an organization, include a concrete step—staff training, accessibility reviews, partnerships with Indigenous providers, or public progress tracking. When used well, social media helps move awareness toward lasting action. National Close the Gap Day Timeline1901  Federation and Exclusion from Federal Health Powers  When the Australian Constitution came into force, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples were largely excluded from federal responsibility for their affairs, leaving health services fragmented under state control and contributing to unequal access.   27 May 1967  Referendum Expands Federal Role in Indigenous Affairs  More than 90 percent of Australians vote to amend the Constitution so the Commonwealth can make laws for Aboriginal people and include them in national population counts, laying the groundwork for later national Indigenous health strategies.   [1]1989  National Aboriginal Health Strategy Endorsed  Governments and Aboriginal community representatives endorse the National Aboriginal Health Strategy, one of the first national frameworks to link Indigenous health outcomes with housing, education, employment, and self-determination.   2005  Social Justice Report Highlights Life Expectancy Gap  Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner Tom Calma’s Social Justice Report 2005 exposes a life expectancy gap of around 17 years and calls on governments to commit to achieving Indigenous health equality within a generation.   [1]November 2008  National Indigenous Reform Agreement Sets Targets  The Council of Australian Governments agrees to the National Indigenous Reform Agreement, establishing specific Closing the Gap targets across health, education and employment to drive coordinated national action on Indigenous disadvantage.

Federation and Exclusion from Federal Health Powers

When the Australian Constitution came into force, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples were largely excluded from federal responsibility for their affairs, leaving health services fragmented under state control and contributing to unequal access.

Referendum Expands Federal Role in Indigenous Affairs

More than 90 percent of Australians vote to amend the Constitution so the Commonwealth can make laws for Aboriginal people and include them in national population counts, laying the groundwork for later national Indigenous health strategies. [1]

National Aboriginal Health Strategy Endorsed

Governments and Aboriginal community representatives endorse the National Aboriginal Health Strategy, one of the first national frameworks to link Indigenous health outcomes with housing, education, employment, and self-determination.

Social Justice Report Highlights Life Expectancy Gap

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner Tom Calma’s Social Justice Report 2005 exposes a life expectancy gap of around 17 years and calls on governments to commit to achieving Indigenous health equality within a generation. [1]

National Indigenous Reform Agreement Sets Targets

The Council of Australian Governments agrees to the National Indigenous Reform Agreement, establishing specific Closing the Gap targets across health, education and employment to drive coordinated national action on Indigenous disadvantage.


FAQ
What are the main factors that contribute to the health gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians?
Researchers and public health agencies point to a mix of social and historical factors, rather than genetics, as the main drivers of the health gap between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and non-Indigenous Australians. These include unequal access to culturally safe health care, overcrowded or poor-quality housing, food insecurity, racism and discrimination within systems, lower incomes and fewer employment opportunities, and disrupted connections to land, language, and culture due to colonization and past government policies. These conditions together increase the risk of chronic illnesses such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, kidney disease, and mental health conditions, which in turn shape life expectancy and overall well-being. [1]
How large is the life expectancy gap, and has it changed over time?
Government data show that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples still have a shorter life expectancy than non-Indigenous Australians, although the size and pattern of the gap vary by sex, age, and region. Since the first national Closing the Gap targets were set in 2008, there has been some improvement in overall mortality and in specific areas such as deaths from circulatory diseases. However, independent reviews note that progress has been slow and uneven, and that the original goal of achieving health equality within a generation is not on track without stronger, community-led reforms and sustained investment. [1]
What is the difference between the community-led “Close the Gap” campaign and the government’s “Closing the Gap” strategy?
“Close the Gap” is a civil society campaign led by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peak health bodies and human rights organizations that began in response to a 2005 Social Justice Report calling for health equality. It advocates for systemic change, self‑determination, and accountability from governments. “Closing the Gap” is the set of formal policies and targets adopted by Australian governments from 2008 onward, initially through the Council of Australian Governments and later through the National Agreement on Closing the Gap. While they share similar goals, the campaign operates independently, often critiques government progress, and pushes for stronger commitments and genuine partnership with Indigenous communities.
Why do experts say Indigenous leadership is essential for improving Indigenous health outcomes?
Health and policy experts argue that Indigenous leadership is essential because Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples best understand their own cultural priorities, community strengths, and local challenges. The 2020 National Agreement on Closing the Gap was negotiated with the Coalition of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peak Organisations and emphasizes shared decision‑making, community‑controlled services, and data that Indigenous communities can govern and use themselves. Evidence from community‑controlled health services shows that when First Nations organizations design and deliver care, services are more trusted, more culturally safe, and often more effective in preventing and managing illness. [1]
How do “social determinants of health” help explain the gap in Indigenous health?
The concept of social determinants of health highlights that people’s health is shaped by conditions such as education, employment, housing, income, access to services, safety, and social inclusion. For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, these determinants are also linked to cultural factors like connection to country, family, and identity. The Closing the Gap framework recognizes that poorer outcomes in areas such as early childhood development, schooling, housing, and employment feed directly into worse health and shorter lives. As a result, many current targets and reforms focus on changing the social and economic conditions that sit behind the health statistics, rather than treating illness in isolation. [1]
Is the health gap only about physical illness, or does it include mental health and wellbeing?
The health gap includes physical, social, emotional, and cultural well-being. Australian frameworks draw on holistic First Nations concepts of health that treat mental health, connection to culture, spirituality, family, and community as inseparable from physical health. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples experience higher rates of psychological distress and suicide than non-Indigenous Australians, which are closely linked to trauma, racism, marginalization, and the legacy of policies such as the forced removal of children. Effective responses therefor,e include community‑controlled mental health services, healing programs, and initiatives that strengthen culture and identity, not just clinical treatment.
Why do some reports criticize progress on Australia’s effort to close the health gap?
Independent evaluations and advocacy groups have criticized Australia’s progress for being too slow, overly top‑down, and focused on narrow targets rather than structural change. Reviews note that several original Closing the Gap targets were not met by their deadlines and that governments often failed to fully fund or properly implement agreed measures. Critics argue that policy has historically been designed for, rather than with, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, which undermines trust and effectiveness. The 2020 National Agreement was introduced partly in response to these criticisms and now places greater emphasis on shared decision‑making, community‑controlled services, and transforming government institutions themselves. [1]